|
|
|
|
|
by stkbach
3996 days ago
|
|
It does automatically summarize any text heavy articles. For example: bbc.com/news
thewashingtonpost.com
huffingtonpost.com
reuters.com
cnn.com
theglobeandmail.com
theguardian.com
en.wikipedia.org Go to any of those as a start and submit one of the articles you find and everything suggested by @gist was generated by an algorithm. Our hope is that will help get the ball rolling. We are certainly very subject to network effects, so focusing on a niche and providing tremendous value to that one vertical is a good strategy. |
|
I tried a couple of articles on Washington Post and the algorithm did a decent job. I then read the gist first before reading an article, and while some sentences were a little hard to understand w/o the surrounding context, I felt I still got a decent summary. I can see myself skimming the article through this service instead of relying solely on my eye balls when scanning through.
Couple of suggestions:
- Linking the extracted sentences back to the original page if I want the surrounding context - A tool/browser plug-in which can allow me to select a representative sentence from the story and submit to gist
Seems like a useful stand alone service as it is; having people vote on and submit gists themselves would be cherry on top.