|
|
|
|
|
by jfb
4003 days ago
|
|
In what way is this a choice between "technically superior" and "nice animations"? The reasons that Firefox, for example, is terrible on OS X is not to do with the quality of the animations (although they are awful) but rather the semantics of user interaction, which are by definition different in non-native applications. And, I'd argue, Firefox is far, far, far from "technically superior" on any number of axes, regardless. |
|