|
|
|
|
|
by cookiecaper
4003 days ago
|
|
>User experience is important. I agree user experience is important, but experience is so much more than simple aesthetics. I'm not saying they're totally unimportant, which is why I included the qualifying clause about "undue hardship", but I have no respect for users that will put themselves at a functional disadvantage so that their experience can be "prettier" (aka "more native"). These people have their subculture, called "Apple", and frankly, I want as little to do with it as possible. Prioritizing glitz above function shows serious problems in critical thinking. If we can make an application look better, cool, we should add that to the list somewhere. I'm not opposed to that. I strongly disagree that this should be anywhere near the primary criterion used to judge an application's value. |
|
Edited to add: And I disagree with them, however I'm downvoting to show disagreement is something that HN has always been against, to it's credit.