Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jacquesm 4000 days ago
It would be a very rare case where a vulnerability related to in-band signalling can be fixed with more in-band signalling.
1 comments

You can if your encoding is explicit about what's in band and out of band. I get the feeling you've never written a protocol ever.
I don't think you even understand the concept of in-band and out-of-band, that's not a function of the encoding. And I've written protocols aplenty in the days when not everything ran on top of HTTP, high speed serial links, with and without virtual circuits (so mux-demux) and a whole slew of others.

Just to make sure you are on the same page as the rest of us here: in-band and out-of-band is a way to distinguish sending meta information about the data stream through the same channel as the original data. You need an escape mechanism for that, so control characters and such.

Out-of-band signalling indicates that all meta information about the data stream travels through a different (virtual) circuit, in which case there can never be confusion about whether a given chunk is data or meta info.

I now understand that your point here is to be insulting.