Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
techonup
4005 days ago
The point is that it didn't work, so exponentiation was out the window.
1 comments
tikhonj
4005 days ago
My point was that 1,1,1 is 1^1,1^2,1^3 and actually fits the pattern :).
link
firethief
4005 days ago
Right - by fitting the pattern but failing the actual criterion, it disproves the consecutive exponents hypothesis.
link