[jimktrains2]

Which strengths the original point. RHEL is suppose to be rock-solid. systemd is not (technical issues aside, it's new and should be vetted more thoroughly), and I have no idea why RH and Debian are staking so much on it. That's what bothers me.

[digi_owl]

RH can get away with it because they still offer support for the RHEL 6.x line.

Debian ramming systemd into stable like they did on the other hand...

[johnny22]

I can't believe you wrote this with actual seriousness. The debate took place over an entire year.

[digi_owl]

Debate, sure. But how long did it sit as default before it officially shipped?