|
|
|
|
|
by jfoutz
4005 days ago
|
|
I'll defer to your expert opinion of course, but it seems like faraday discovered some odd behavior in 1821, maxwell codified it in 1861. By 1884 Heaviside reformulated them into the modern form. Perhaps 100 years is an exaggeration, but the point is it takes time to make sense of what the heck is going on. Really, pick anything. someone notices something odd, tries to explain it. there are many many experiments. Someone really clever ties them together in a nice way. Someone else really clever cleans it up. Einstein and general relativity is the only counterexample i can think of. But I'm pretty sure Poincare had a formulation of special relativity. |
|
It took approximately 100 years after Darwin for all relevant fields of science to come to a more or less consistent understanding of the history of this planet.
That's how long it took for (1) paleontologists to dig up enough fossils, sort them, categorize them, and determine the relationships between them; (2) geologists to figure out how plate tectonics have shaped Earth over long periods of time; (3) physicists to discover and refine radioisotope dating methods; and (4) astronomers to place all of that in the context of the evolution of the universe as a whole. If any of these pieces didn't come together at the right time, we might still be teaching young-Earth creationism in schools.
Contrary to popular perception, science moves rather slowly. We who work in the fast-moving subfield of computer science and information technology often forget that.