|
|
|
|
|
by mikeash
4006 days ago
|
|
The problem is that the effect being compensated for is so tiny that it's really noisy. It's not like leap years, where all you have to do is measure the actual period of the Earth's orbit very precisely and come up with a nice way to fit the appropriate correction factor into the calendar. The Earth's rotation is slowing, but it's not a steady process. For example, the Boxing Day earthquake in 2004 permanently decreased the length of the day by about 3 microseconds. Here is a graph of the changes over the past few decades: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5b/Deviatio... |
|
Also, given all that variance and the fact that we only seem to be shifting around 1 minute per century at the current rate, we probably could get by having a leap minute every few decades when necessary.
This works fine for any system trying to interact with other computers and humans while keeping consensus on the time. Any system that is trying to determine earths yaw would no longer be able to rely on F(time), but that is only a minor inconvenience.