|
|
|
|
|
by e12e
4003 days ago
|
|
Great points. One thing that bothers me about these "encrypted webmail"-services, is that they all depend on TLS for whatever thin sliver of security they provide. Then they go and use something that's not S/MIME and/or x509 for end-to-end (or whatever kind of) encryption/authentication. At least leaning on pgp makes sense in because it is already somewhat deployed and in-use. But since they all fall apart if TLS has a hole, it seems odd to add another layer. The complexity of any other solution for encryption/authentication must surely outweigh the benefits of OurCleverCryptoSystem(tm)? I'm not aware of any advances that have changed the possibilities of asynchronous secure messaging: you can't have PFS, key distribution is hard. At least with x509/gnupg you can partner with someone like youbikey, and at least pretend to lower the ux friction and increase the real-world security of the system. /rant |
|