|
|
|
|
|
by ScottBurson
4004 days ago
|
|
You're getting a lot of pushback on this, but I think it's a legitimate question at the very least. In this situation I would wonder whether some procedural abstractions could be introduced to cut down the size of the expansions. And before anyone jumps on me -- I have 35 years of Zetalisp and Common Lisp experience and have written some pretty hairy sets of macros. There might turn out to be no easy way to make the expansions smaller, but there's nothing wrong with asking the question. |
|