[joncameron]

From your link:

> In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.

Which is of course intriguing, since cat-v.org hosts frothing-at-the-mouth vitriol about topics like women in tech and gay marriage in the always trustworthy and well reasoned medium of reposted reddit and slashdot comments. And presumably I'm supposed to click over to the technical stuff with a straight face.

[roghummal]

It's telling that you'd apply a derogatory label and attack the source medium rather than say anything of substance about the content that offended you.

cat-v is chock-full of food for thought. You don't have to agree with any of it and in fact disagreement is a large part of the site.

"Other than total and complete world domination, the overriding goal is to encourage and stimulate critical and independent thinking."

[fnordfnordfnord]

Upon encountering the frothy-mouthed bits, you could return to the gell-mann-amnesia-effect node, and treat it as a disclaimer.