|
|
|
|
|
|
by huskyr
4010 days ago
|
|
|
> 'looks like something from the 21st century' is not something I get
> immediately.
> 1: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=eu.siacs.conve.... I'll bite. If i would be a non-techie the things i would notice are: * What's Jabber / XMPP? I don't know what that is. Why should it be in the title? * All the screenshots (there are many!) basically look the same. I don't understand the conversations in the screenshots. * It's not free. * The first line "Conversations is an open source Jabber/XMPP client for Android 4.0+ smart phones.". What's open source? What's Jabber/XMPP? What's a 'client'? The only words i understand in this sentence are 'Android' and 'smart phone'. * "Design principles" is not something i care about. Simply tell me what this product does. * Clicking on 'Read more' gives me a text that is so technical i don't understand a single word of it ("XEP-0065: SOCKS5 Bytestreams - or rather mod_proxy65"?) |
|
|
Again, comparing to Telegram [1] (see disclaimer in my previous post: I use that as well):
* Jabber/XMPP is a weird point. You wouldn't need Conversations if you wouldn't have a server to use. You pick up Conversations because a) some friend tells you to install it and connect it to their server or b) you have a server of your own. If you don't know what XMPP is, then yes - this client is not for you.
* Really? Can you look at the Telegram screenshots? Let me bite this time:
Hey Lucy, got a second?
As in the duration of 551557906200 periods of the radiation corresponding between the two superfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atoms? Yes, I might.
We need some data extracted from a secret chat…
* It's free. [2, GPL] I know, Joe User isn't going to build it, but again: You need a server for this to work. If you care about that, I'd say you have ways to save the 2.38 EUR if necessary.
The rest of your points are certainly valid (marketing for XMPP sucks), but again entirely different problems. I highly doubt that most people read the description of the Telegram or WhatsApp apps. Friends recommend it, people install it, use it, done. XMPP is a different case, because it requires a friendly server (and the post installation configuration step where you select one), but that's not quite relevant for the 'looks like something from the 21st century' discussion, is it?
I was trying to make the point that there are ~new~ and current clients for XMPP as well, even if Pidgin looks like shit.
1: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.telegram.m...
2: https://github.com/siacs/Conversations