Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by scurvy 4007 days ago
I'd actually like to lay the blame where it belongs, at the feet of YCombinator (the incubator, not the commenter crowd). YC's boilerplate options plans included share transfer restrictions and made early exercise (83b elections) out to be the bogeyman. Almost every YC company has the same option plan because of PG's tutelage. People copied these plans because "hey it's what YC does."

Let's be perfectly frank and talk about the facts here:

1) There is zero cost to the company to allowing 83b elections. All it does is remove the possibility of golden handcuffs (which are very effective when a new unicorn is minted every week).

2) There is no more "500 shareholder rule" after the JOBS act. It removed that. There is no penalty for having lots of shareholders -- especially when most stock transferred has no voting rights and no disclosure rights. Facebook "paid the price" for having lots of shareholders but in reality they did not. GS's investor vehicle took care of that. Facebook was not "forced" to go public. They went public at an incredibly old age as far as growth companies go.

3) There's an almost non-zero cost to have another company (like SecondMarket) handle share registration and transfers. It's not a huge overhead. Consider it your Nerf ammunition cost for the quarter.

4) The state of current stock option agreements is not to help you the employee. It's for the benefit of the company. Option agreements in the 80's and 90's did grow out of an altruistic "hey we're all in this together" theme. Today, it's "hey I have to give you these things because everyone else does, but if it were up to me, you would get bupkis and free meals."

Full disclosure, I work at a YC funded, non-unicorn. My shares (on paper) are worth a fair amount of money, and I need several $100k to buy the shares and pay taxes. I feel like I'm in a not-uncommon state. I know my options are technically worth zero right now since I can't sell them for anything (that is the definition of worth), but I know my wife will divorce me if I quit and walk away from them.

I've heard that Uber is supposedly the worst at this. There's no timeline specified in the option agreement. You must offer them right of first refusal, but there's no mention of timeliness. They can (and do) choose to ignore every share transfer that comes up in a board meeting (unless you're in the elite inner circle and are allowed to sell shares).

tl;dr Don't even consider a position at a company whose option agreement won't let you early exercise and won't let you freely transfer shares.