|
|
|
|
|
by kentonv
4006 days ago
|
|
Weird, what is the reason to do that instead of restricted stock? It sounds functionally identical except more complicated and with possibly worse tax implications. I'm sure there's some silly accounting reason having to do with option pools and cap tables. |
|
On a restricted stock grant, the recipient has to either pay for the shares on day one, or the company gives them to the recipient for free and the recipient incurs a tax liability for the value of the stock on day one.