|
|
|
|
|
|
by Roodgorf
4006 days ago
|
|
|
The first graph on that second link is a bit confusing and seems pretty disingenuous. It has the "observations" region stretching to 2050. The rest of the article seems much more factual and interesting, but why start with something so misleading if your supposed goal is to debunk misleading projections? |
|
|