[moubarak]

My doubt is based on divine scriptures, and there are experiments (as per the article i mentioned) that agree with it. What's wrong with that? You can still experiment and prove divine wisdom, it doesn't have to be forced knowledge.

[mikeash]

The main thing that bugs me is that it seems extremely dishonest to converse in this way, where you bring up vague references to articles to support your position, when the real reason you believe in it is because of your religion.

You say you can still experiment and prove divine wisdom. Can you experiment and disprove divine wisdom? In your eyes, is it possible even in theory that it could somehow be proven that human activity is in fact affecting the climate? Because if you've already decided on the outcome and are just casting around for support, what you're doing is not experiment, it's just an exercise in cognitive bias.

[matthewmacleod]

There is little to no evidence that current climate change is a natural event.

as per the article i mentioned

You didn't link to this article, so it's content is not useful, and it's likely it didn't say what you imply.

You can still experiment and prove divine wisdom

No you can't.