|
|
|
|
|
|
by Qwertious
4010 days ago
|
|
|
The problem is that they deal with making laws on a variety of subjects, which necessitates understanding said subjects. They don't understand the subjects. Say what you like about programmers, but most of them don't actually have any job-related responsibilities in the field of nursing, breaking the analogy. |
|
|
They are indeed required to understand the subjects, but they have no realistic way to. There are simply too many subjects. If we want to sit around saying "legislators are dumb and don't understand us", fine. It won't solve anything, but it will make us feel really nice about how smart and special we are. I like feeling smart and special too.
But if we actually want to fix anything, we have to think about the system wholistically and understand what motivations and pressures a legislator is under. There are simple too many subjects for a legislator to understand all of them well. Committees help somewhat, but are flawed. Lobbyists are the current way that legislators gain information about industries but that comes at the cost of drastically warping priorities. If anyone wants to comment with some actual insight and detail into those problems, that would be nice.