|
|
|
|
|
|
by mikeash
4017 days ago
|
|
|
Can you explain what you mean by effectively destroying history by preserving it? That doesn't make any sense to me. And I also don't understand the link between merge commits and a failure to ensure that all commits to master should work. If you make changes in a branch, get everything up and running there, then merge to master, does that not ensure that everything on master works? |
|
|