|
|
|
|
|
by pskocik
4017 days ago
|
|
I think he makes a valid point about how it's not necessary to have both develop and master if you use tags. On the other hand, I think the `--no-ff` merges is what git-flow got right. The separation of features into their own branches is useful. It's basically about grouping related commits together. You can always render the history in a way that looks prettier and even if you can't--the history doesn't need to look pretty, the final product does. |
|
Have you not found the ability to investigate/audit bugs hindered by non-linear histories?