[omouse]

The only thing GitFlow had going for it is that it has a clearly written article about it with pictures that explain how it works. That's it; the freedom of git and being able to define what works for you is too much for people and they think they need to turn development back into Subversion-style or desktop-release style.

[ryanthejuggler]

I agree with you, with one addition in GitFlow's favor--it standardizes how your team works. When you have multiple team members collaborating on a project, a poor standard is better than none at all.