[lecha]

Does this mean we should expect http://com./ http://net./ etc?

[iamdanw]

Didn't CNet used to use http://com./?

[eli]

no, they had com.com (e.g. http://news.com.com/). I believe that domain is now for sale. Probably gets a TON of typo traffic.

[pauldino]

For whatever reason they actually used com.com.

[tedmielczarek]

Because it was the dot-com boom, and what was better than one dot-com? TWO!

But yeah, they then proceeded to put everything under .com.com, so they had news.com.com, cnet.com.com etc. It was painfully stupid.

[seldo]

I believe the justification was so they could use unified cookies across all their properties -- they set the cookie for "com.com", and then it was available to news.com.com, search.com.com, downloads.com.com, etc., in the same way that yahoo.com cookies are available to news.yahoo.com, sports.yahoo.com, etc.