Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rspeer 4012 days ago
Etherpad was completely unmaintainable when it was shut down as a service and open-sourced. Its first, open-source major rewrite (etherpad-lite) didn't work. It took a second major rewrite by a profit-motivated startup (Hackpad) to become useful again.

I think that if Etherpad had been GPLed, we would still have nothing but etherpad-lite, and we would lament Etherpad as a lost technology.
2 comments
kentonv 4012 days ago
I'm curious what you mean when you say etherpad-lite "didn't work". I use it fairly regularly and while I'll agree it's not nearly as refined as Hackpad, it seems to basically function.

(Note that I'm not debating the GPL point. I don't personally think Hackpad's forking the code has had any meaningful effect on etherpad-lite's popularity; there are plenty of collaborative document editors out there.)

link
rspeer 4012 days ago
It would corrupt its data when too many people were using it at the same time.
link
castell 4012 days ago
Wrong. The current Etherpad open source project and what you mean are not the same. The first one is the predecessor of Google Wave Java based product, and the current one "Etherpad Lite" is a JavaScript & Node.js based open source project - a reimplementation, possible as Google open sourced the original Java code.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etherpad

link
kentonv 4012 days ago
Etherpad was not a predecessor to Wave -- Wave was already released when Etherpad was acquired. They did use similar ideas, though.
link