Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rs232 4014 days ago
For some reason I believe that cosmetic gene modifications will be more readily accepted than GMOs.
2 comments

^ This is it. I can be GMO as a human and have acme free skin? Thank you and here is your $25,000. This will be seen as medical benefit since it cures disease and I can have Green/Hazel eyes.

Seriously I refuse to eat Chipotle with their fear mongering Anti-GMO stance on the front window.

Yeah, Chipotle's anti-gmo stance has really killed my desire to eat there. It's is a shame because they had previously been relatively good on the environmental front. Then they fell into the pseudo-science deep-end and here we are.
So is genetically modifying your body pretty safe?
Hell, no. CRISPR has the benefit of specificity, but the kit must be delivered to the cell by live virus, which can cause problems (heavy immune response), especially if you are infecting with a high enough titer to affect a majority of cells.
Plus, it will end racism and make anime hair color a reality.
I'm not sure I agree with ending racism. Maybe you were being tongue-in-cheek.

I mean, presumably someday far in the future, everyone will have access to the ability to alter fully their entire genome.

I would think in the next XX years, though, there will be plenty of remaining distinguishing features beyond skin color, and more importantly, plenty of people without the money to make any changes.

Besides that, I'm hopeful that we'll still retain diversity, so I'd think we'll still have plenty of races for ignorant folks to hate.

When racism is done, we'll just continue hating for other reasons. I speculate class will lead the charge next.

>Maybe you were being tongue-in-cheek.

Just a bit.

>plenty of people without the money to make any changes.

>I speculate class will lead the charge next.

Exactly, it transforms the race problem into a class problem. People will probably discriminate based on how many designer genes you have. With time, most governments (not necessarily the US) will realize how much they can save by giving people healthy genes from the start, and it won't be as much of a class divide.

Fads will come and go regarding some group of genes being better from such task or other. Like diets and workouts today, it will become tiresome for most people quickly enough.

This is good. In the last century we transformed race from a military problem to a political problem. In this century it will become a technical problem. There will be plenty of nastiness, but each step reduces nastiness by an order of magnitude.

>I'm hopeful that we'll still retain diversity

We will win a whole new diversity. There will be people with chameleon skin walking among us in this century.

>With time, most governments (not necessarily the US) will realize how much they can save by giving people healthy genes from the start, and it won't be as much of a class divide.

The poverty-as-disease model already shows that governments could save money by treating/preventing poverty rather than providing lifetimes of palliative care[1]. The problem is the moralizing about poverty.

[1] https://medium.com/basic-income/universal-basic-income-as-th...

Look, 10% of the people in my office building already have neon-colored hair. They use dye.