|
|
|
|
|
|
by click170
4017 days ago
|
|
|
I'm sorry but I just can't sympathize. Imagine a newspaper trying to go after someone for not reading the ads in the news paper, or for cutting the ads out before reading the paper. That's what you sound like to the rest of us. When my browser asks for a page from your webserver, I'm under no obligation to render or even receive the packets that you send back to me. If you seek further guarantees or protections I encourage you to find a different medium. |
|
|
Of course, just as if you receive mail you are under no obligation to read it. But I'm not talking about that level. I'm talking about the contract the consumer and the content provider have. You either believe there is one or you don't. I believe there's a reason that the content provider is giving me content, and it's not out of the goodness of their heart. What reason is that, and what strings are attached?