[douglasheriot]

Wow, that sucks. Another reason to use ZFS – you’d notice the corrupted files a lot sooner.

[Freaky]

Yup. I was seeing occasional corruption with my SanDisk Extreme Pro's and quite happy that ZFS was able to repair the damage each time.

The problem appears to have gone away following a firmware update, touch wood.

[icebraining]

Or run a verification layer on top of whatever FS you use (e.g. running git fsck would discover corruption in your git indexed files too).

[ThatPlayer]

Or Btrfs on Linux.

[rleigh]

In theory, yes. Unfortunately, every time my Btrfs filesystems have encountered a hardware glitch, it has happily trashed the filesystem beyond recovery (including both drives in a RAID1 mirror, one of which was perfectly OK). I use ZFS now, and while some features are compatable with Btrfs, the implementation quality, documentation, and feature completeness, and tool quality set it well above where Btrfs is at.

[naranja]

I fully second that: I'm using btrfs for / and ZFS for /srv. So many rashed filesystems beyond recovery on btrfs, so many joy, stability and easy tools for ZFS.

I'm really about to consider to migrate / to ZFS now.