[ougawouga]

I'm glad Greenwald called then put for using the term "boyfriend" for his 10-year old spouse. Something didn't sit well with me about that term, but I couldn't have vocalized it. It seems meant to evoke sexual connotations, when they played no part in the story.

[ams6110]

"spouse of ten years" might be a better phrasing.

[classicsnoot]

I think the solution here is universal adoption of the term partner.

[venomsnake]

Well ... he is his boyfriend and due to his relationship with Glen was more potent tool for putting pressure. So it is relevant.

[randomname2]

The point is, if he were married to a woman, they would probably have called her "his wife", and not "his girlfriend".

[rhino369]

Are they married though? Gay marriage is legal and if they aren't, boyfriend isn't "gross" here.

[jccc]

"After two years of living together, they became common-law husbands."

David Miranda: "I never met anyone like Glenn — he's my husband and I don't know where either of us would be without each other."

Greenwald: "They [the goons who detained Miranda at Heathrow airport] humanized the story, and they gave a platform for my charming and admirable husband to speak out."

http://www.buzzfeed.com/natashavc/david-miranda-is-nobodys-e...

Regardless of whether they are technically, legally married according to a particular definition, they consider themselves to have been married for 10+ years, and actually do seem to have some legal basis for that view.

BTW, I can think of other minority populations that historically have been named by the majority with diminutive words -- language that intuitively sees that population as less legitimate. Perhaps a good rule of thumb is to call people what they want to be called, and default to the respectful choice if we don't know.

(Full disclosure: I am a man married to a man.)

[tres]

I'm sorry, but doesn't this completely ignore the fact that the state has not sanctioned partnerships between same-sex couples and codified that relationship universally? And where those partnerships are sanctioned, it has only happened recently?

And doesn't this ignore that a partnership lasting ten years between adults intrinsically has more gravitas than the 'boyfriend' moniker implies?

I don't make my living writing, but I can easily think of a word that better represents that relationship. Someone who professes to be a professional writer, but can't do that either shouldn't be writing, or has an underlying agenda they are trying to fulfill by using what is obviously the wrong word for what is being described.