| Let's look at this slightly
differently: Suppose the 10
year old child the CPS abducted from
playing safely in their back yard
was -- right, you guessed it --
a girl. In this case some fathers might --
I won't if only because I'm not a
father -- might, ..., might,
right, what's the term? CPS abducted his 10 year old
daughter: Zuilly makes a bundle
selling pretty princess and angel
clothes to grand parents for their
grand daughters, often just 10.
Those princess, angel clothes
indicate some of the protective
emotions grand parents and parents
have for daughters, e.g., Perfect
Daughter. In our society, there
are strong norms that girls are
cared for, protected. And CPS abducts her? Perfect daughter? Am I getting to make this situation
clear? Okay, maybe it's her dear dad
or her dear uncle, one or both
fresh back from Akrapistan,
maybe Army Rangers, maybe
Seal Team 6. And CPS abducted
Perfect Daughter playing safely
in her backyard? CPS might be in line for a Darwin
award. Looks like Perfect Daughter
needs two or three very devoted,
young, healthy German Shepards or
Rotweilers. CPS overreach is not all just
click bait: I know a family,
well known coast to coast, in
US finance, famous name,
wealthy, generous philanthropists.
Well, at one point a son of about
8 in the family fell and, maybe,
bruised his arm or some such. Well, somehow CPS paid a visit. Insisted
on getting involved. Issued
this and that order
to the parents. Absurd. Wacko. Overreach. If my startup works, I
get financially comfortable,
and CPS or some such
makes trouble for
the nephews, nieces, etc.
in my family, then
I will go to a big, powerful,
all-go, never-stop,
nail'em to the wall law
firm and see just how much
legal trouble we can cause
CPS and its wackos. If they want a legal fight
and my checkbook is much
thicker than theirs, then
bring it on. It will be
a good purpose for my startup
work. I don't like gumment
wackos hurting
families and children. It's happened. It shouldn't. |