|
|
|
|
|
by escape_goat
4031 days ago
|
|
As I've mentioned elsewhere, my concern was with the nature of the parent comment's argument, rather than with the ideas he was seeking to defend. A utilitarian position is of course quite defensible; one could even argue for a sort of triage. What I was interested in, however, was how facile and insufficient his counter-arguments actually were, and how scant the consideration of empathy actually was, even though he started by saying: > All I long for is logical consistency and empathy... I think my mini-essay would have been greatly improved if I had thought to address that directly. |
|