|
|
|
|
|
by dmgbrn
4030 days ago
|
|
I have to disagree with you on this. A language should be expressive enough that it can easily support correct concurrent programming, and readily expose runtimes (OTP is a great example) that have support for concurrency and distributed programming. However, patterns like message passing instead of shared memory are not a panacea. Deadlocks and non-deterministic behavior can still happen in such systems if programmers do something stupid. Enforcing these patterns at the language level smells of the old "let's make a language that doesn't allow programmers to write bugs!" trap. |
|