|
|
|
|
|
by fensipens
4032 days ago
|
|
blaming Github for doing crypto right So github is doing crypto right by unnecessarily exposing data that is _only_ relevant to a) the user and b) his personal access to his repos? By this logic, why not make crypto even better and add something like github.com/user.address, github.com/user.mail or github.com/user.phone? |
|
public keys are essentially opaque tokens that do nothing more than ensuring that a counterpart of a connection is whoever you think is associated with the public key. The key itself does not convey that information. It conveys no information at all beyond its cryptographic properties.
Turning a key into anything else (e.g. through re-use, publishing it elsewhere in association with other data) is not an intrinsic property of the key.
On the other hand personal data such as an address cannot be easily replaced like a key, immediately ties it to a person and does not provide any cryptographic properties at all.
TL;DR: pubkey is not private data, user.address is not crypto