|
|
|
|
|
by implicit
4036 days ago
|
|
This is very consistently my biggest problem with OCaml: it just doesn't follow conventions set in other ecosystems. I predict this is the sole reason it could never be "the next Java." It's worth noting, however, that I've had very, very few problems with the semantic properties of the language. I think the slog is worth it for that reason. |
|
Well, the reason is that Caml predates those ecosystems; the original Caml was released nearly a decade before Java [1], and ML itself dates back to the 1970s.
[1] http://caml.inria.fr/about/history.en.html