| - How does toxic lithium mining fair to the countless oil spillage disasters that happen every few years? It doesn't. Lithium mining is now a rising industry in the dawn of the electric era, and it is nonetheless a limited resource which will very shortly need to start being synthetical, simply out of practical necessity. - Tesla has been profitable for numerous financial quarters, although not consistent. On that basis, neither has been GM for many quarters after the crisis, after causing an $11.2 billion loss to the American tax payer. - Tesla is funded mostly by competitors and revenue, not by the tax payer. Read the above sentence again for contrast: GM caused a direct loss of $11.2 billion to the tax payer. Tesla only borrowed and then repaid in full. - The subsidy granted to Tesla by the US gov, only a minuscule percentage of the GM bailout, was repaid in full with interest by Tesla, with the tax payer making a profit. The loan was around $450 million, not $11 billion. - Does the fictional subsidy working in the favour of the so called ultra rich really work out better than the oil barons of the world? Which is really the strongly monopolised industry with price strictly regulated in favour of private interest? Does the name Rockefeller or Saud ring a bell? - How does the net time value of a Tesla fair to a normal middle class sedan? Well, it's only the higher upfront class you pay. On a 10 year span Tesla directly competes with most mid level sedans. - Furthermore, iteration takes a long time and cost efficiency takes the longest time in manufacturing, if you weren't be a belligerent skeptical. - I can see your finances do not buy you a Tesla just yet and that makes you angry. The secret to changing that is to stop blaming the "ultra rich" for your problems and take a real good look in the mirror. Do you really not sense any irony in your "ad hominem arguments"? If must warn you that a brain dead moron might be dangerously close to you. I don't particularly care you've found fault in my logic as being belligerent makes someone like you feel good, this is the Internet after all. But if you are a third party reading this, don't get stuck on the fact that you can't yet afford a Tesla. And when you do the math, don't look at upfront cost only, that's the worst way to do it. Add up fuel cost for your average mileage, average maintenance, repairs, insurance premiums, tax credits over the number of years you plan to keep it for and workout the real value. You will be amazed to learn a Tesla isn't that expensive after all. A 70D starts at $57k and from thereon you can start decreasing tax credits, fuel savings and so forth. Is it really more expensive or are you unaware about what the net time value of a purchase is? Time to get your economics in order. Lastly, every business starts out with an overpriced overbloated product, even if you're launching a stupid new social network for dogs, it always takes time to become efficient. Let alone with cars. People who haven't built things from scratch often lack this sense of continuous iteration that is necessary, but I would really re-consider my position against Elon and Tesla and all the great work they have been doing. |