|
|
|
|
|
by achow
4034 days ago
|
|
> If you shrank a 777 to the size of a soda can, its skin would be about four times thinner than the average can's. My take..
The difference between inside and outside of soda can is approx 175 (kPa).
The difference between inside and outside of aircraft cabin at the cruising altitude is 56.6 (kPa).
So Soda can bears differential of approx 3 times than the pressure differential that aircraft cabin structure supports, with material 4 times thinner. Aircraft is 12 times more safer than a soda can (!) Interesting.. aircraft safety engineers at work. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabin_pressurization http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-altitude-pressure-d_46... |
|
An aircraft fuselage needs to withstand THOUSANDS of cycles of pressurization / depressurization during its service life, which is usually much more critical then the static pressure load, due to metal fatigue. This is why aircraft service life is given in flights (which corresponds to one pressurization cycle) and not in flight hours or miles or whatever. This is also why aircraft used on longer routes tend to last for more years (longer flights = fewer pressurization cycles).
edit: If anyone wants a reference, here goes one http://www.airspacemag.com/need-to-know/what-determines-an-a...
edit2: Additionally, consider checking my response to another comment. The diameter of the fuselage is so much bigger than the soda can that the actual stress on the walls are roughly only 1.5x bigger on the soda cans.