[wz1000]

> "return()" is in no way a function.

Ah, but in Haskell, `return` is a function, though it shares only a few similarities with with its counterpart in C-like languages.

However, when using continuations or a continuation passing style, the continuation is a function that behaves almost exactly like traditional return when called!

    (define (multiply x y return)
      (return (* x y)))

[wz1000]

Was there something factually incorrect in my comment?

[stonogo]

Was there something relevant in your comment?

[wz1000]

I was pointing out that if you can consider sizeof a function, you can consider return one too.