|
|
|
|
|
by loganfsmyth
4033 days ago
|
|
Yeah, I wish that were handled better too. Since the parser is expecting a statements, it parses it like {
a
}
= 5
As in, a block with just an "a" in it, followed by an assignment to nothing, which throws an syntax error.You can however do ({a} = 5);
to make the parser switch to expecting a destructuring pattern instead of an block statement. |
|
But regardless, the corrected version of your example: `let a; ({a} = {a:5});` works like a charm and is very handy! Thanks for the tip!