|
|
|
|
|
by ColinWright
4036 days ago
|
|
> Where do you get the contents of 'records' from?
I download the "newest" and "news" pages every 15 minutes or so, then collate the data. > If we merge bbc.com and bbc.co.uk, we
> end up with 125 / 10,000. I suppose
> that isn't that many compared to others,
It's less than some, but not as many as, say, nytimes.com or techcrunch.com. But it's a major news site, so I'm not surprised people read it and go "Oh, that's interesting, I'll click the HN bookmarklet and submit it." > ... still higher than I think it should be.
What do you think it "should be?" > A nice solution might be to remind people,
> ... that it's better to go to the source ...
I personally find it useful to read a non-technical overview, and then if interested, go and find the technical version. Often the article with technical details borders on unreadable. |
|