[mikecmpbll]

Any output like this, unless maliciously fallacious, is contributing in some way to the general understanding of the software concerned and benchmarking best-practices, even through its mistakes.

It's the job of the reader to judge their sources wisely, and interrogate what they read, rather than the job of the author to conduct their explorations in private.

Understandably, it can be frustrating for people involved in the projects but that's just the nature of the beast. They can do things to help their cause by championing good examples of benchmarking, even those which don't look upon them favourably.