Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cryptoz 4036 days ago
If you're disappointed in Obama over the USA PATRIOT Act, that's your own fault - he was very clear about his opinions on USA PATRIOT from long before he ran for office, as early as 2003 (or 2006?). Obama has voted in favour of expanding/extending the USA PATRIOT Act's powers from the earliest possible time that he had US lawmaking influence.

There are many reasons to be disappointed in Obama perhaps, but he was clear about this from Day 1: He supports unchecked US domestic spying.

Citation: http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm

3 comments

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections...

Excerpt from that page:

2007 — A Promise on the Road to the White House By 2007, Obama is campaigning for the White House and making government transparency a central part of his platform. He tells an audience in Washington that the Bush administration “puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we provide.”

As president, Obama says, he will provide U.S. intelligence agencies the tools they need to defeat terrorists without undermining the Constitution. “That means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens. No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime … No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient.”

Then again, so did his (non-third-party) opponents. Not a lot of choice available.
> non-third-party

You're imprisoned in a cage of your own making.

I frequently vote third-party. I'm not under the illusion that they have any hope of winning.
Maybe enough of us will someday make a difference.
The US first-past-the-post system is the maker of the two-party cage.
More like a cage of Duverger's law.
There were some options during the primaries (like Dennis Kucinich), and this is why the primary elections are so important. None of the No-to-USA-PATRIOT options made it past the primaries, so we were left without much real choice.
Any reason your citation is from a wacky conspiracy site?
Oh, I didn't realise, it was the top result for my search. I'll fix it with a proper link soon, there are many legitimate sources for that data. Sorry about that.

Edit: Changed to http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm.