[vdaniuk]

There is no "our" and there is no "we". Developers, web developers, JS developers or even HN users who are JS developers are not:

* a tribe

* a close-knit group

* an industry union

You do not assign blame to hundreds of thousands of professionals, who live in different parts of the world, speak different languages and work on different projects.

The web evolves without intelligent design or regard of your personal interests. Deal with it or withdraw in denial to the perfect land of perfect web technologies.

[guelo]

> not:

> * a tribe

> * a close-knit group

> * an industry union

unfourtunately

[vdaniuk]

I would love to see some sustainable structured cooperation with at least thousands of developers participating.

https://snowdrift.coop <-- this is a great example, btw

[kyllo]

Oh ok, well then I guess it's just Google's fault.

[vdaniuk]

It's Google fault as in a mistake, a defect, an offense that they've created a popular js framework? Is that a correct interpretation of your words?

[kyllo]

Only if you feel that Angular itself was a mistake.

I do, primarily because it's yet another attempt in a long history of misguided attempts to bestow Turing completeness on XML.

[AlexC04]

Not at all! Honestly there are some WONDERFUL things about angular. There are some bad ones too.

- Polling for changes vs. event driven - two way data bindings causing infinite redraw loops. - "feels like O(n^2)" performance on ng-repeats / large pages

but things like the templating, directives, data-binding... they are all really good things.

And dependency injection! They have really moved the needle forward on client side testing.

No angular in itself is not a mistake at all. There are mistakes without question. I suspect the angular 2.0 release will address many of the major criticisms. Though, I haven't read much about it yet.

[kyllo]

ng-if, ng-switch, ng-repeat? There's already a language in the browser that does these things, it's called JavaScript.

Why do you even need dependency injection and singleton services and factories in a dynamic language with closures and first-class functions? You don't. Client-side testing works fine without DI. Angular is just a way to do Java in JavaScript. It's a pile of unnecessary complexity designed to sell to enterprises that love over-designed Java projects and want to make client-side development feel more similar to what they know. In that regard I suppose Angular is a little better than Google Web Toolkit, but that isn't saying much.

[andybak]

> ng-if, ng-switch, ng-repeat? There's already a language in the browser that does these things, it's called JavaScript.

It's nice to have a largely declarative way to specify markup but still allow simple loops and conditionals.

Hasn't every template language in the world has come to a similar conclusion?

[sillygoose]

The overarching problem here is herd mentality. Using Angular is a bad idea, but lots of companies are using it anyway because The Herd stampeded towards the new shiny thing, mostly because of how cool two-way binding looked in Angular's demo toy app.

Now all those companies are bogged down by Angular, but feel like ejecting it would be too costly. Elsewhere, lots of new developers are introduced to Angular and invest time and effort into learning it because they don't know any better.

Herd mentality is a big problem. It's basically the polar opposite of thinking for yourself, and as such, extremely detrimental in other aspects too.

[arcatek]

> Using Angular is a bad idea, but lots of companies are using it anyway because The Herd stampeded towards the new shiny thing

The most ironic thing in all this is that your comment is still full of Herd mentality, except that it goes the other way.

Angular is a framework, period. Using it is neither a good or a bad idea, it all depends on the people who actually use it.

[debaserab2]

I can make functional prototypes very, very quickly with angular. There are things it does not do well, in my opinion, but it has given me a tool that previously didn't exist in the JS world.

I don't care about the turing completeness of angular.

[vdaniuk]

I don't.

If Angular has produced a local optima of efficiency in the range of "misguided attempts" then it's effect on the development ecosystem was a net positive.

That said, I am extremely concerned that most popular frameworks/libraries are products of megacorps.

[Bahamut]

That is in part due to the complexity of problems in frontend and that most companies don't need to solve those problems (or don't have the resources to solve them).

[vdaniuk]

Ember would be a notable counter-example.

I think a more important reason would be that Facebook/Microsoft/Google media influence and corporate support creates massive brand awareness and generates instant interest. Educational projects anticipate the interest from developers and create courses, tutorials and reviews. The cycle continues and bam! we have an information cascade[0].

Rich get richer and poorer get poorer (in developer mindshare). Megacorps reap the benefits while indie developers are not able to achieve critical mass.

I shudder when I think about the possible Typescript/Microsoft, Angular/Google, React/Facebook domination in web technologies.

[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_cascade

[sitkack]

I think that has more to do with developer evangelists/pr people and budgets. Most good ideas languish in obscurity, even when given the light of day.