|
|
|
|
|
by stonogo
4046 days ago
|
|
You've misunderstood the real issue. Not being open source is mildly annoying, but not really a problem. The actual problem here is that, having decided to use a non-free license for their code, they created a shitty one, which will not hold up, and is unsuitable for use when entering into a commercial relationship. They still have plenty of time to repair this before going live, or public, or exiting stealth, or showing anything to anyone, or whatever they feel like calling it. But such an obvious misstep is very, very concerning to see in a company that proposes to maintain the software that manages such an important resource. |
|