[Dylan16807]

Yeah, I pretty much can't imagine a situation where I would lose the money in my bank account but at the same time my bitcoins would be safe.

It's not that it's absolutely safe, it's that bitcoin has no advantage on that front.

[Karunamon]

It becomes a lot easier when people make the connection that "bitcoin == cash, but online".

It's just that everyone is used to credit cards being the primary way to pay for things on the internet, and they think the model is the same, when it's radically different.

What happens when you give cash to someone for something and it turns out they scammed you? Your cash is gone. Involve the authorities or just eat it.

What happens when you lose your wallet in real life? The cash inside is gone, you don't get it back.

What happens when someone steals your wallet? The cash is gone.

Etc, etc, etc.

[dragonwriter]

Of course, all these things are reasons that many people prefer credit cards for in person transactions even though cash is available for them. So, I'm not sure that replicating all the problems of cash for online transactions is a great selling point for bitcoin.

[JoshTriplett]

> Yeah, I pretty much can't imagine a situation where I would lose the money in my bank account but at the same time my bitcoins would be safe.

I can imagine such situations, but they're the kind where you're more worried about your stockpiles of ammunition and canned goods, not bitcoins. Short of total economic failure, banks are "safe" in well-defined ways.

(On the other hand, erosion of wealth in traditional currencies due to inflation is just as real as fluctuation of wealth in cryptocurrencies.)

[Dylan16807]

In those situations I would not call my bitcoins safe. If I'm in physical danger, my possessions and passwords are in danger too.

[davidgerard]

Fortunately, reliable TCP/IP networking and chip foundries producing ASICs are expected to remain readily available in the post-apocalyptic Mad Max gasolinepunk future.

[yellowapple]

> Yeah, I pretty much can't imagine a situation where I would lose the money in my bank account

Those who witnessed the Great Depression (or similar events involving bank runs and financial crashes) probably could.

[mpyne]

There's a reason the Great Depression pre dates the things that were mentioned like FDIC.

I'll leave alone for now the fact that it was the government boogeyman that implemented the changes that make things like bank crashes wiping out a family's meager savings a historical artifact.

[yellowapple]

I'm well aware that the Great Depression is the reason why banks are insured in the modern age.

That insurance has limits, though; not only is the amount limited, but the U.S. government - like all non-fictional things - has finite budget/capital (no matter how much Congress likes to pretend otherwise).