|
|
|
|
|
by hahamrfunnyguy
4049 days ago
|
|
I like the anonymous aspect, and knowing what a company is willing to pay for a given position helps as a candidate, but I didn't see any advantages for the employers. The problem for employers is getting quality candidates in for interviews. Recruiters can bring lots of candidates in, but often candidates aren't the right fit or high quality. If you could find a way to vet quality candidates without commissions, you'd have an interesting product. This is the hard part, because usually the best people never have to really look for work. What remains? - People out of work because they are not skilled or have outdated skills
- People who would like to switch jobs, but are doing something very specialized so there are limited opportunities
- Someone who may switch if given a tantalizing opportunity |
|
Tech is so interesting and varied, that my hypothesis is, that there is sizeable chunk of people, who'd switch jobs if interviewing for the next one weren't a big deal. They are solid programmers, with anywhere from 2 to 25 years of experience, but are super rusty in their data-structures, algorithms and system-design skills. They have been at their companies for a few years, have lost touch with interviewing and don't have enough help to get back in shape.
I started out to validate my hypothesis by starting a bootcamp for technical interviewing: http://InterviewKickstart.com. We kick their practice back into gear in a very comprehensive way. It's going better than I'd ever thought I could make of it.