[marktangotango]

Down voting because the op didn't saying anything about 'cares more about engaging' or 'cares about his daughter'. That's blatant misrepresentation of the what the op did write.

[danieltillett]

No it is not. I asked a question on how the op thinks a 22 year old paid to look after his daughter is more engaged with her than either him or his wife.

[marktangotango]

Oh really? Let's examine the text of this post, and one other in this same branch of the thread:

>> I am curious why you think a 22 year old on near minimum wage cares more about engaging with your daughter

>> I am still surprised that rainier thinks that a 22 year old paid to look after his daughter cares more about her than him and his wife.

Maybe that's what you thought, but that's not what you wrote.

[danieltillett]

We have a statement from rainier that a 22 year paid to look after his daughter is more engaged with her than either him or his wife. What motivation does this 22 year old have for being more engaged than him and his wife? This is what I mean by cares.