| Please go read the article again, and think carefully about what you're advocating for. Why do you believe that? What, precisely, is death buying us as a species that's worth 150000 lives ended every single day? In what way are we incapable of "renewal" without it? And wouldn't you prefer to solve those problems some other way? Wouldn't that be a wonderful problem to have? Death is an accident: it's the result of an evolutionary process that selects for reproduction but pointedly not for longevity. And we've already curtailed many of the large-scale forces of evolution, for the better. We go to great lengths to help people survive who would have simply died if born mere hundreds of years ago, let alone thousands of years ago. Would you let them die for being "unfit", so that evolution works more efficiently? If the cure was available within your lifetime, in reality rather than in a hypothetical, would you really choose not to take it? Why? What would you possibly have to gain by doing so? You mentioned not wanting to lose your loved ones; presumably they wouldn't want to lose you either. But if you feel so strongly about dying, nobody's stopping you. I certainly don't think it's sensible to force anyone to accept a cure for mortality. On the other hand, attempting to prevent others from creating and using such a cure would be tantamount to mass murder. Please, think very carefully about the implications of what you're advocating before repeating the romanticisms that have sprung up around death. Death is bad. Aging kills a hundred thousand people a day, and other causes kill another fifty thousand. Let's make it stop, and the sooner the better. |