|
|
|
|
|
by mkyc
6046 days ago
|
|
Because it is possible with a Turing machine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Turing_machine http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:CgFC04CcivAJ:folk.uio.n... The idea (iirc, and poorly translated into more familiar vocabulary) is that when we're running a quantum Turing machine on a regular machine, the data on the tape can be "quantum encoded". There is a specific series of steps for "decoding" it, but it's a destructive operation: decoding the data screws up the data. Decoding it a second time gives you broken data, and you know that it's broken. (You might wonder, why don't we just write a Turing machine that can decode the data without destroying it? Well, you're free to do so, but then it's no longer a quantum Turing machine running on a Turing machine - it's no longer the same as the physics, can't be implemented directly in quantum physics, and therefore would be both slow and potentially have a tape with more slots than atoms in our universe.) |
|