Just curious, have you seen any research on the efficacy (and cost efficiency) of those features you say should be required?
What's interesting is the case for a subsidy based on reducing government costs when people are killed and injured. reduced insurance costs could also make the time-to-payback for individual purchasers very short.
What's interesting is the case for a subsidy based on reducing government costs when people are killed and injured. reduced insurance costs could also make the time-to-payback for individual purchasers very short.