|
|
|
|
|
by oska
4049 days ago
|
|
I have a little bit of a problem with the word 'creatives' used in this way to describe a category of people (and often as a self-descriptor). It implies that some people are creative and some people are not. Because if everyone was creative then why use the word? Further, it is talking only about a supposed quality of a person and not what they actually do. Otherwise it would be 'creators'. And if you are using these resources, surely it is to actually do some 'creating'? |
|
I love sci-fi, and I was asking her the question because the future utopian dream is that the 3-D Printing cornucopia machines deliver to humanity all they want, and the only task left to do is to create. So to me it seems settled. All people are creative as children and somehow that goes away as they become adults. I suspect people just adapt to the best way for them to get by, creative or drudgery, whatever it takes. The modern school system can probably take some credit, as well as human's normal tendency to adapt to whatever the herd is doing - ie if all your adult friends stop playing with LEGO maybe you would too. (I did not stop playing with LEGO)
So I hope all humans are once more makers, and we can stop with silly labels. I have been making stuff for 40 years+ and it seems odd that the world now has a word to describe what I was always doing.