|
|
|
|
|
by mreiland
4052 days ago
|
|
> As for the sexist part, reverse sexism is not a thing -- if the playing field is so imbalanced, then explicitly favoring the discriminated-against group is a fair measure to level the playing field. You're conflating anti-discriminatory with reverse sexism. Anti-discriminatory is passing a law that requires any company that gets tax breaks to meet some requirements of diversity. reverse sexism is coming across a female owner who only hires women (I know of 1 such company). |
|