|
|
|
|
|
by lispm
4051 days ago
|
|
> So what's stopped these from getting to Emacs' level of popularity? Emacs is not an editor. Emacs is a family of editors. You are probably talking about GNU Emacs. They never tried and it would not make sense. GNU Emacs exists already and supports Lisp development very well. The other tools have concentrated on other things: GUI-based IDEs for Lisp. |
|
You tell me, you brought it up!
> They never tried and it would not make sense. GNU Emacs exists already and supports Lisp development very well. The other tools have concentrated on other things: GUI-based IDEs for Lisp.
Emacs is for more than Lisp development, though. It's not popular because you can do Lisp in it, it's popular because you can do everything in it. So we're back to my earlier question, which is why we haven't seen major, broad-based wins for Common Lisp, on the scale that we have for other languages.