[mmanfrin]

Keurigs in the office are the most ridiculously wasteful things -- it wastes more time having everyone sit and wait for single-use pods to brew than for someone to just open up a stupid packet of grounds for a large carafe.

I really can't understand why offices use keurig.

[patmcc]

>>I really can't understand why offices use keurig.

It eliminates the interpersonal drama that can waste crazy amounts of time in an office. If there's a large central carafe of coffee, it can lead to:

people fighting over what brand/roast/strength to make

people fighting over a freeloader not refilling it

people fighting over who cleans it and how often

etc.

(I know that sounds crazy, but I've seen it)

With the pods, everyone can get their own coffee/tea/whatever in a little independant transaction, no drama. To the company there might be a slight increase in cost (but still almost nothing) and increase in waste (do most companies care?), but their employees are happier, so it's an easy trade off.

Edit: I'm not saying I support the use of these pods in offices, just giving some of the reasoning companies have embraced them in some places.

[brazzledazzle]

I wonder if it would make more sense to give everyone the reusable fillable ones and keep 2-3 different bags of coffee around. Best of both worlds?

[function_seven]

Choice. In my office we have four types of coffee: Strong, Medium, Weak-as-hell, and Decaf.

The coffee maker has one brew position and two extra hot plates. At any given time there are three carafes sitting on the hotplates, about 1/2 full. And they've been sitting there for a couple hours. When I want a cup of coffee, I smell the existing ones, toss whichever one is the most burnt, and brew a whole pot. Then I pour my one cup. Maybe one other person will have a cup and the rest gets tossed when someone else has to make room for their choice.

I'm not saying I'd prefer a Keurig—I prefer drip-brewed to that—but I understand why an office would like to have one. Not having to wait for an entire pot to brew would be nice.

[lobster_johnson]

Tried a French press (aka cafetière or press pot)? You get them in many sizes, from large down to single-cup, they are super fast and easy to fill, and a lot of people think it produces better-tasting coffee than drip.

[function_seven]

Yeah, I have one actually. It's been a long time since I've used it, but I just might bring it to work. Thanks for the reminder.

[boyaka]

The two floor office building I worked at had three standard office coffee brewers as well as the espresso machines, while my school had the Keurig machine. The coffee brewers are indeed my favorite of the three, but I thought the espresso machines were gross quality compared to Keurig. I would argue the coffee brewers waste a lot more time, because they would be emptied quick (especially in the morning) and it takes a good 10 minutes or more to brew a pot, not to mention potentially some cleaning effort. There were several times where I would go to get some, it would be empty, somebody would be preparing another, and I'd have to wander around to the other brewers to check them or wait. I would still probably prefer those over Keurig, but I'm really not sure I can agree that the Keurig machines waste more time (although the usage of the machine at my school was pretty low).

[manarth]

The main difference is high-pressure water (espresso/keurig) vs low pressure water (drip coffee). They taste very different (e.g. whiskey vs beer).

You could even argue that there's less waste in espresso-style…people make a single drink at a time, and generally drink it. With large carafes of drip coffee, a lot gets thrown away because sitting too long on a hot plate causes it to taste burnt.